Answer:
-
Add fallback providers: Route to a backup model when the primary fails, so outages don't halt you.
-
Abstract behind a gateway: Wrap providers uniformly, so failover is seamless.
-
Use circuit breakers: Stop calling a failing provider and switch fast, so you don't hang on a dead one.
-
Degrade gracefully: Serve cached or reduced responses during outages, so users retain some function.
-
Monitor provider health: Track latency and errors, so failover triggers before users notice.
Answer:
-
Rerank and position well: Place the most relevant chunks at the start and end, so they aren't lost in the middle.
-
Limit context size: Provide fewer, more relevant chunks, so nothing important is buried.
-
Rerank aggressively: Ensure only the best chunks are included, so the model isn't diluted.
-
Force multi-source citation: Require citing several chunks, so the model must engage with all provided context.
-
Test middle-context recall: Evaluate whether mid-context facts are used, so the effect is measured.
Answer:
-
Use continuous batching: Add and remove requests dynamically like vLLM, so requests don't wait for a full batch.
-
Set a max wait time: Flush partial batches after a deadline, so latency is bounded.
-
Separate latency tiers: Batch throughput-oriented work separately from interactive, so each gets suitable handling.
-
Size batches adaptively: Adjust batch size to load, so you balance throughput and latency dynamically.
-
Prioritize interactive requests: Let latency-sensitive ones jump the queue, so they aren't stuck.
Answer:
-
Separate instructions from data: Structurally delimit untrusted content, so it's treated as data, not commands.
-
Apply least privilege: Limit tool scopes and credentials, so a successful injection has limited blast radius.
-
Gate high-impact actions: Require confirmation for consequential steps, so injection can't complete damage alone.
-
Block untrusted-driven egress: Prevent data flowing to endpoints suggested by content, so exfiltration is stopped.
-
Red-team continuously: Probe with novel injections, so defenses evolve against new attacks.
Answer:
-
Evaluate on hard cases: Test quantized quality on the cases that matter, so degradation is measured where it counts.
-
Choose the right method: Compare AWQ, GPTQ, and FP8 for your model, so you pick the least lossy.
-
Try mixed precision: Keep sensitive layers at higher precision, so critical quality is preserved.
-
Tune the trade-off: Balance memory savings against quality loss, so you don't over-quantize.
-
Validate before deploying: Confirm quantized quality meets the bar, so regressions don't ship.
Answer:
-
Retrieve iteratively: Use each hop's result to form the next query, so chained lookups work.
-
Decompose the question: Break multi-hop questions into sub-questions, so each hop is explicit.
-
Track intermediate findings: Carry results across hops, so later retrieval builds on earlier.
-
Bound the hops: Cap iterations, so multi-hop retrieval doesn't run away.
-
Verify the chain: Check each hop's result supports the next, so errors don't compound.
Answer:
-
Use a supervisor: Have a coordinator break ties and assign turns, so agents don't circularly wait.
-
Set timeouts: Bound how long an agent waits, so deadlocks self-resolve.
-
Order resource acquisition: Impose a consistent acquisition order, so circular waits can't form.
-
Detect cycles: Monitor for mutual waiting, so deadlocks are caught and broken.
-
Define clear ownership: Assign task ownership unambiguously, so agents don't both wait to act.
Answer:
-
Calibrate against humans: Validate judge scores on a human-labeled set, so agreement is measured.
-
Use explicit rubrics: Grade against clear, granular criteria, so scoring is consistent.
-
Control for bias: Counter position, length, and self-preference effects, so scores aren't skewed.
-
Ensemble judgments: Average multiple runs or models, so variance drops.
-
Audit disagreements: Review judge-human mismatches, so systematic errors are found and corrected.
Answer:
-
Use paged attention: Allocate KV-cache in pages like vLLM, so memory is used efficiently and fragmentation drops.
-
Cap concurrent sequences: Limit simultaneous generations to what memory allows, so you don't over-commit.
-
Evict or preempt: Swap out lower-priority sequences when memory is tight, so high-priority ones proceed.
-
Bound context length: Limit sequence length, so per-request cache stays predictable.
-
Monitor cache pressure: Track memory usage, so you throttle before failures occur.
Answer:
-
Propagate a trace ID: Attach one correlation ID from entry through every system, so the flow is linkable.
-
Centralize telemetry: Aggregate logs and metrics in one place, so you don't chase five dashboards.
-
Log at each hop: Capture input and output at every stage, so the path is reconstructable.
-
Visualize the trace: Render the full request flow, so failures are locatable at a glance.
-
Correlate across systems: Link related events by trace ID, so the complete picture assembles.
Answer:
-
Test against an eval set: Measure each prompt variant on a fixed set, so improvements are objective.
-
Change one thing at a time: Vary single elements, so impact is attributable.
-
Ablate sections: Remove parts to find what matters, so dead weight is identified.
-
Version prompts: Track variants and their scores, so you can compare and revert.
-
Guard against overfitting: Validate on held-out cases, so gains generalize.
Answer:
-
Validate and scan files: Check type and scan for threats before processing, so malicious files are caught.
-
Sandbox parsing: Extract content in isolation, so a malicious file can't compromise the system.
-
Treat content as untrusted: Never let file content issue instructions, so injection via files is blocked.
-
Limit resource use: Cap file size and processing, so files can't exhaust resources.
-
Fail safely: Handle unparseable or suspicious files cleanly, so failures don't cause harm.
Answer:
-
Detect refusals: Recognize when the model declined rather than answered, so it's not treated as valid output.
-
Retry with rephrasing: Reformulate and retry legitimate requests, so occasional refusals are overcome.
-
Provide clear context: Frame internal requests to avoid triggering refusals, so they succeed.
-
Fall back gracefully: Handle persistent refusals without crashing, so the pipeline continues.
-
Log refusal patterns: Track what triggers them, so recurring false refusals are addressed.
Answer:
-
Load-test at target scale: Simulate 10x traffic, so you find limits before production does.
-
Identify bottlenecks: Determine what breaks first, so you know where to reinforce.
-
Test dependencies too: Load the vector DB, provider limits, and tools, so the weakest link surfaces.
-
Verify horizontal scaling: Confirm adding capacity actually helps, so scaling works as assumed.
-
Provision headroom: Ensure capacity ahead of the ramp, so you're not scrambling.
Answer:
-
Link answers to document versions: Track which version each answer used, so staleness is detectable.
-
Invalidate on update: Clear cached answers when their source document changes, so stale ones aren't served.
-
Re-index changed documents: Update retrieval when documents change, so new answers use current content.
-
Version cache keys: Include document version in keys, so updated docs miss stale cache.
-
Verify freshness on serve: Check the answer's source is current, so staleness is caught.
Answer:
-
Version config: Track config in source control with history, so changes are auditable.
-
Require review: Gate config changes behind approval, so risky edits are caught.
-
Validate on load: Check config against a schema, so invalid values are rejected.
-
Tag requests with config version: Record which config each request used, so behavior maps to config.
-
Enable fast rollback: Revert config independently, so a bad change is quickly undone.
Answer:
-
Enforce read-only access: Run generated SQL under a restricted account, so it can't write or lock harmfully.
-
Validate before executing: Parse and check the query against an allow-list, so dangerous queries are blocked.
-
Set query limits: Apply row limits and timeouts, so runaway queries are bounded.
-
Run against a replica: Execute on a read replica, so production isn't affected.
-
Preview before running: Show the query for confirmation on risky operations, so users catch problems.
Answer:
-
Use hybrid search: Combine keyword and vector search, so exact and semantic queries both work.
-
Detect exact-match intent: Route code and quoted phrases to keyword search, so precision is preserved.
-
Weight by query type: Favor keyword matching for identifiers and semantic for concepts, so each fits.
-
Index for exact match: Maintain a keyword index alongside vectors, so exact lookups are fast.
-
Merge and rerank: Combine both result sets and rerank, so the best of each surfaces.
Answer:
-
Speculate only on likely paths: Prefetch high-probability next steps, so waste stays low.
-
Gate on cost: Skip speculation for expensive operations, so wrong guesses don't cost much.
-
Cancel early: Abort speculative work once the real path is known, so waste is minimized.
-
Speculate for latency-critical paths only: Reserve it where speed matters most, so cost is justified.
-
Measure the trade-off: Track wasted cost against latency saved, so speculation stays worthwhile.
Answer:
-
Build evals from production: Source test cases from real traffic, so evals reflect actual usage.
-
Include the hard long tail: Add real edge cases, so evals aren't dominated by easy ones.
-
Match production conditions: Test with realistic noise and formats, so results predict reality.
-
Correlate eval with live metrics: Check that eval wins translate to production gains, so you trust the evals.
-
Refresh continuously: Feed new production failures into evals, so the gap doesn't reopen.